Architectural services commonly involve the creation of intellectual property, including design concepts, drawings, plans, specifications, and models.
The Code requires client agreements to clearly explain:
- who owns intellectual property associated with the services;
- terms of any licence granted to the client to use the intellectual property;
- limits on the client’s use of the intellectual property; and
- circumstances where additional costs or consents may apply for the client’s use of intellectual property.
Disputes commonly arise where clients and architects have different assumptions about ownership and use of drawings and designs. The Code requirements help ensure clients understand:
- what they are paying for;
- what they are allowed to use; and
- whether designs can be reused or modified.
Conclusion
The Code requires intellectual property provisions in client agreements to be transparent, clear and unambiguous. This helps clients and architects to understand their respective rights and obligations in relation to intellectual property created during a project.
Client agreements that clearly deal with intellectual property rights and obligations help support professional client-architect relationships and reduce the likelihood of intellectual property disputes.
Failure to adequately deal with intellectual property issues in a client agreement may constitute unprofessional conduct and may result in regulatory action.
Updated

